Scaling from 100 to 1,000 Engineers: What Stripe and Shopify Teach Us About Building at Global Scale

Scaling an engineering organization from 100 to 1,000 people is not a matter of simply adding more talent, it’s a structural transformation. The processes, communication patterns, and architectures that support a team of 100 begin to strain under the weight of increased complexity. As the organization expands, alignment becomes harder, dependencies multiply, and technical decision-making must evolve from fast, informal exchanges to systematized, intentional frameworks.

This is where the architected evolution comes in.

Evolving Technical Architecture for Scale

From Monoliths to Modular Systems

Many companies at ~100 engineers still operate within a monolithic codebase. While this accelerates early-stage development, monoliths become coordination hotspots at scale. Moving toward modular services (not necessarily full microservices) partitions complexity and enables smaller teams to deliver independently.

Internal Developer Platforms Become Essential

As the organization grows, the cognitive load on individual developers must decrease. Mature engineering companies build internal developer platforms (IDPs) that automate deployments, standardize tooling, and abstract infrastructure complexity.

Companies like Stripe and Shopify highlight the importance of these platforms:

• Shopify, as a fully distributed engineering organization, invested early in internal tooling to ensure that engineers working across multiple time zones could deploy and recover systems without relying on synchronous communication. Their platform work was designed to reduce operational toil and preserve high reliability across thousands of daily deploys.
  
  
• Stripe built internal systems centered on speed with safety, including strong API contract enforcement, internal documentation standards, and paved paths for development. Their IDP approach helped keep velocity high as engineering headcount crossed into the hundreds and later into the thousands.
  
  

These companies demonstrate that shared infrastructure is not overhead, it is a force multiplier.

Structuring Teams for Autonomy and Alignment

Small, Cross-Functional Ownership Units

Jeff Bezos’ “two-pizza team” principle becomes non-negotiable at 1,000 engineers. Teams should be small, autonomous, and cross-functional; product, engineering, QA, design, all aligned to a single mission.

This structure mirrors Conway’s Law: the organizational design shapes the system design. With bounded contexts and clear ownership, teams can move faster and reduce cross-team dependencies.

Shopify: Designing for Distribution

Shopify offers a compelling example of how team design must reflect organizational reality:

• As a remote-first company, Shopify could no longer rely on spontaneous hallway alignment or verbal knowledge transfer.
  
  
• They compensated with intentional team topology, heavy use of written proposals, ADRs (architecture decision records), and async communication norms.
  
  

Shopify’s approach underscores a key lesson: distributed teams require distributed clarity, and clear ownership boundaries are the foundation.

‍

Scaling Processes and Communication

Documentation Becomes Infrastructure

At ~1,000 engineers, documentation determines whether new hires take 2 weeks or 3 months to contribute meaningfully. Shopify is a standout example here; their writing culture is foundational, enabling engineers across continents to collaborate asynchronously without losing context.

Decision Frameworks Replace Ad Hoc Choices

Decision-making structures formalize autonomy. Instead of escalating every choice to leadership, organizations provide:

• RFC processes
  
  
• Architecture review paths
  
  
• Decision matrices
  
  
• Guardrails for experimentation
  
  

This preserves speed while ensuring technical consistency across hundreds of teams.

Communities of Practice

Cross-cutting knowledge communities, around testing, observability, reliability, ML, frontend frameworks, help prevent silos. At scale, no single team can innovate in isolation; communities preserve shared standards and mentorship networks.

Leadership Development and Career Tracks

Stripe: A Dual-Track Leadership Model Done Right

Stripe is one of the best-documented case studies of how to scale leadership without creating hierarchy bloat or forcing engineers into management.

Stripe built:

• Fully articulated IC ladders (Staff, Senior Staff, Principal, Distinguished)
  
  
• Parallel manager tracks
• A writing-first culture, where clear written communication is the currency of influence
  
  

As Stripe scaled past 1,000 engineers, this structure allowed the company to preserve deep technical leadership while also elevating managers who specialize in org health.

Their internal motto, “Great engineering requires great writing”, is a scalable truth for any organization past ~150 engineers.

Clear Ratios and Responsibility Boundaries

Industry research suggests a 7–10 engineer to manager ratio is optimal for balancing oversight and autonomy. Organizations that scale effectively define what managers, tech leads, and senior ICs are each accountable for  preventing role overlap and burnout.

Measuring Performance with Meaningful Metrics

Metrics need to evolve from activity-based to outcome-based. Frameworks like DORA and SPACE guide organizations toward measuring:

• Deployment frequency
  
  
• Lead time for change
  
  
• Change failure rate
  
  
• Mean time to recovery
  
  
• Satisfaction and flow
  
  

Elite engineering organizations are over 3x more likely to achieve their business goals using these metrics.

What gets measured becomes manageable, especially at scale.

‍

Culture, Safety, and Learning Systems

Psychological Safety as a Scaling Advantage

Research from Google’s Project Aristotle shows psychological safety is the strongest predictor of team performance. At 1,000 engineers, blame-based cultures slow the organization; learning cultures accelerate it.

Mentorship and Knowledge Transfer

Stripe and Shopify both emphasize structured mentorship, onboarding playbooks, and written knowledge systems. These practices counteract the natural fragmentation that occurs as teams scale.

Operational Excellence as Culture

Incident reviews, chaos testing, and experimentation without fear of punishment contribute to system resilience. Teams that learn from failures outperform teams that hide them.

Onboarding, Developer Experience, and Internal Velocity

As organizations scale, developer experience (DX) becomes a critical performance driver. Investing in DX can produce outsized returns:

• Faster onboarding
  
  
• Fewer context switches
  
  
• Reduced cognitive load
  
  
• Higher psychological satisfaction
  
  
• Lower turnover
  
  

Shopify and Stripe are both strong examples of companies that turned internal developer experience into a competitive advantage. Shopify in particular built internal systems that made remote onboarding seamless even at global scale.

Scaling Is a System, Not a Headcount Metric

Scaling from 100 to 1,000 engineers is not a simple matter of adding more people — it requires a deliberate rethinking of architecture, team boundaries, communication, leadership, and culture. Companies like Shopify and Stripe demonstrate that it’s possible to scale rapidly without sacrificing quality, but only when organizations invest early in the foundations that support autonomy and alignment.

Success at this stage comes from building modular architectures that reduce dependency friction, creating internal platforms that accelerate development, and fostering a writing culture that preserves shared understanding across continents. It requires clear leadership pathways that separate technical and managerial growth, intentional team design that mirrors system architecture, and a commitment to outcome-driven metrics that keep teams focused on what matters. Most importantly, it demands a culture rooted in psychological safety, continuous learning, and operational discipline.

The organizations that thrive at scale are those that view engineering as an evolving system,  one that must be designed, nurtured, and continuously refined. Scaling isn’t about headcount; it’s about constructing a structure that can support complexity without collapsing under its weight. The companies that understand this early are the ones that maintain velocity, quality, and innovation long after crossing the 1,000-engineer mark.

Carbon is the go-to staffing specialist for Eastern European and North African technical talent. Trusted by the biggest names in technology and venture capital, Carbon’s hyperlocal expertise makes entering new talent markets for value-seeking global companies possible.

Honouring exceptional talent ®

‍

^References:

^{DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA). (2023). Accelerate: State of DevOps and engineering performance research. Google Cloud. [1]}

^{Fowler, M. (2014). Conway’s Law. Martin Fowler. [2]}

^{Google. (2016). Project Aristotle: Understanding team effectiveness. Google re:Work. [3]}

^{Shopify Engineering. (n.d.). Engineering blog. Shopify [4].}

^{Stripe. (n.d.). Stripe engineering & technical culture. Stripe. [5]}

^{Stripe. (n.d.). Inside Stripe: How we work. Stripe. [6]}

^{Swarmia. (2023). How engineering effectiveness changes as teams scale. LinkedIn. [7]}

‍